Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Ethereum delays Glamsterdam upgrade as eight smart contract risks emerge

    November 6, 2026

    Dev Update: Formal Methods | Ethereum Foundation Blog

    November 6, 2026

    Binance and Polymarket Propose Polygon Hard Fork To Recover About $6,500,000 in Hacked Crypto

    November 6, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Friday, November 6
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    Blockchain Echo
    Banner
    • Lithosphere News Releases
    • Bitcoin
    • Crypto
    • Ethereum
    • Litecoin
    • Altcoins
    • Blockchain
    Blockchain Echo
    Home » Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage
    Ethereum

    Security Alert – Solidity – Variables can be overwritten in storage

    Sophia BrownBy Sophia BrownNovember 5, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Summary: In some situations, variables can overwrite other variables in storage.

    Affected Solidity compiler versions: 0.1.6 to 0.4.3 (including 0.4.4 pre-release versions)

    Detailed description:

    Storage variables that are smaller than 256 bits are packed together into the same 256 bit slot if they can fit. If a value larger than what is allowed by the type is assigned to the first variable, that value will overwrite the second variable.

    This means if an attacker can cause an overflow in the value of the first variable, then the second variable can be modified. Creating an overflow in the first variable is possible using arithmetics or by directly passing in a value from the call data (values in call data are aligned to 32 bytes, and padding is neither verified nor enforced).

    Contracts that only use the types listed below for state variables are not affected. Arrays, mappings and structs (based on those following types) are also not affected:

    • signed integers, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • bytesNN types, including sizes smaller than 256 bits
    • unsigned integers (uint) of 256 bits

    Contracts with types smaller than 256 bits that are never next to each other (note that state variables of base contracts are “pulled in”) are not affected.

    The Ethereum multisignature wallet contract is not affected.
    Note that addresses take up 160 bits, so contracts that only use addresses and 256-bit types are safe. Additionally, addresses and booleans are almost never manipulated via arithmetic operations in practice, so contracts using only addresses, booleans and 256 bit types should also be safe.

    The following contracts may be affected:
    Contracts containing two or more contiguous state variables where the sum of their sizes is less than 256 bits and the first state variable is not a signed integer and not of bytesNN type.

    Types smaller than 256 bits include:
    bool, enums, uint8, …, uint248, int8, …, int248, address, any contract type

    Recommended action:

    • Recompile contracts that have not yet been deployed using at least Solidity release 0.4.4 (not the pre-release or nightly version).
    • Deactivate, remove funds from, or upgrade already deployed contracts.

    This vulnerability was found by [github.com/catageek](https://github.com/catageek): [https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306](https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/1306)



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBitcoin ETF inflows return as US crypto legislation faces delays
    Next Article SignalPlus hack costs under $82K as exchanges revoke API keys
    Sophia Brown

    Related Posts

    Dev Update: Formal Methods | Ethereum Foundation Blog

    November 6, 2026

    EIP-8037/EIP-8038 Glamsterdam | Ethereum Foundation Blog

    November 6, 2026

    Security alert – All geth nodes crash due to an out of memory bug

    November 6, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    FCA weighs easing UK prediction market ban

    September 7, 2026

    The many weird AI depictions of Michael Saylor

    September 7, 2026

    Ethereum EIP-8141 could remove need for users to hold ETH for gas

    September 7, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    About Us

    Stay updated on the world of cryptocurrency
    Your one-stop source for daily crypto news and insights
    Blockchainecho.info: Your trusted daily crypto companion

    Most Popular

    FCA weighs easing UK prediction market ban

    September 7, 2026

    The many weird AI depictions of Michael Saylor

    September 7, 2026

    Ethereum EIP-8141 could remove need for users to hold ETH for gas

    September 7, 2026
    Copyright © 2025
    • Home
    • Buy Now

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.