Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Gav’s Ethereum ÐΞV Update III

    August 2, 2026

    BNB Chain sues ex-employee over $628K memecoin trade

    August 2, 2026

    TRX on Solana makes as much sense as ETH on Bitcoin

    August 2, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Sunday, August 2
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn YouTube
    Blockchain Echo
    Banner
    • Lithosphere News Releases
    • Bitcoin
    • Crypto
    • Ethereum
    • Litecoin
    • Altcoins
    • Blockchain
    Blockchain Echo
    Home » Crypto PAC spending tops $2M in Michigan House race
    Crypto

    Crypto PAC spending tops $2M in Michigan House race

    John SmithBy John SmithAugust 2, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



    A crypto industry-aligned political action committee has pushed its spending above $2 million in Michigan’s 13th Congressional District, according to final-week Federal Election Commission disclosures. 

    Summary

    • Protect Progress spending surpassed $2 million backing Thanedar and opposing McKinney before Tuesday’s primary vote.
    • $884,240 in new advertisements supported Thanedar, while more than $150,000 targeted McKinney with opposition messaging.
    • August 4 voters will decide the Democratic nominee after over one million Michiganders voted early.

    Protect Progress is supporting Democratic incumbent Shri Thanedar and opposing challenger Donavan McKinney before the Aug. 4 primary.

    Protect Progress is affiliated with the Fairshake network, which has received major funding from companies including Coinbase and Ripple. The latest filings added $884,240 in media supporting Thanedar and more than $150,000 in spending against McKinney. The additions effectively doubled the amount reported about a week earlier.

    Crypto PAC spending tops $2M before Michigan vote

    Protect Progress is registered with the FEC as an active independent expenditure-only committee, commonly called a super PAC. Its spending supports or opposes candidates but does not represent money transferred directly to their campaigns. The latest expenditure notices are available through the committee’s official FEC filings.

    The committee’s processed FEC summary may not immediately show every last-minute purchase. The agency states that its independent expenditure table excludes separate 24-hour and 48-hour notices, which committees use to disclose spending close to an election. One of the latest Michigan notices was filed through this FEC disclosure.

    The scale is notable beside the candidates’ own finances. McKinney’s campaign reported $1.23 million in total disbursements through July 15. Protect Progress’s outside spending has exceeded that amount, although the figures cover different reporting periods and forms of political activity.

    Thanedar’s crypto votes drew industry support

    Thanedar voted for the stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in the House. In an official statement, he described the measures as steps toward clearer rules, consumer safeguards and wider financial access, while acknowledging that the bills were “not perfect.”

    The House-approved CLARITY Act remains under consideration in the Senate. Protect Progress has not stated in its FEC notices that any specific vote caused its spending decision. However, the committee generally supports candidates viewed as favorable toward digital asset legislation.

    As previously reported, Protect Progress had disclosed more than $986,000 in Michigan spending by July 23. The latest filings pushed the total above $2 million during the final two weeks of the primary.

    McKinney makes the spending a campaign issue

    McKinney has used the outside funding to criticize Thanedar’s crypto policy record. In a July 21 statement, he alleged that “the crypto lobby is paying my opponent back” for votes that benefited President Donald Trump’s digital asset interests.

    That statement represents a campaign allegation. FEC records confirm that Protect Progress paid for independent advertisements, but they do not establish McKinney’s claimed motive or demonstrate coordination with Thanedar’s campaign. Federal rules require super PAC expenditures to remain independent of supported candidates.

    The Michigan spending forms part of a broader national strategy by Fairshake and its affiliates. Public Citizen estimated that crypto companies had supplied about $189 million during the 2026 election cycle, with Fairshake-linked groups accounting for more than $82 million in expenditures. Those totals represent the watchdog’s analysis rather than an FEC finding that every dollar came from one industry source.

    Aug. 4 result will test the spending strategy

    Michigan voters will choose the Democratic nominee on Tuesday, Aug. 4. More than 1.03 million residents had voted by the morning of July 31, according to the Michigan Department of State. Statewide early voting continued through Aug. 2, with some jurisdictions offering voting on Aug. 3. Completed absentee ballots must arrive by 8 p.m. on election day.

    The result will offer a near-term test of whether Protect Progress’s final advertising surge helped Thanedar. However, it will not prove that PAC spending alone determined the outcome because turnout, candidate organizations and local concerns also shape congressional elections.

    Additional FEC notices or amendments may appear after voting ends. The official canvass will confirm the nominee, while later campaign-finance reports should provide a fuller account of the committee’s total Michigan spending. No verified crypto market reaction has been tied to the race.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleCrypto gamblers debate fart while Trump releases hot air
    Next Article On Bitcoin Maximalism, and Currency and Platform Network Effects
    John Smith

    Related Posts

    BNB Chain sues ex-employee over $628K memecoin trade

    August 2, 2026

    Russia bans Moscow crypto mining from Aug. 15

    August 2, 2026

    A build error in Coldcard’s firmware drained $38 million in bitcoin in 25 minutes

    August 2, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Cardano (ADA) flashes technical reversal signals following Coinbase integration

    June 3, 2026

    The U.S. Bitcoin Reserve blueprint is due in July

    June 3, 2026

    Uniswap brings token launch auctions and price discovery to Base

    June 3, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    About Us

    Stay updated on the world of cryptocurrency
    Your one-stop source for daily crypto news and insights
    Blockchainecho.info: Your trusted daily crypto companion

    Most Popular

    Cardano (ADA) flashes technical reversal signals following Coinbase integration

    June 3, 2026

    The U.S. Bitcoin Reserve blueprint is due in July

    June 3, 2026

    Uniswap brings token launch auctions and price discovery to Base

    June 3, 2026
    Copyright © 2025
    • Home
    • Buy Now

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.